Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Wertz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1989No. C0-89-396PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Director of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board filed with this court a petition for public discipline alleging that the respondent Mary F. Wertz, while automatically suspended from the practice of law for failure to pay attorney registration fee as required by Rule 2, Supreme Court Rules for Registration of Attorneys, actively practiced law from October 1986 until July 15, 1988. The petition further alleged that this court had placed respondent on restricted status pursuant to Rule 3, Minnesota Rules of Continuing Legal Education. Notwithstanding that a person on such…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SiglerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. In Re Fagre-StroetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against RudawskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against FagrestroetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API