Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Railway Fuel Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 30, 1924No. 6 Div. 817PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAYRE, X

Appellant sued in the right of his intestate as an employee of defendant, alleging that defendant had negligently failed to provide intestate with a reasonably safe place in which to perform the duties of his employment, and in another count alleging that defendant employer had negligently failed to comply with the statute (General Acts 1911, pp. 515, 516, § 40), requiring operators of coal mines to provide and maintain ample means of ventilation. Demurrer was sustained to the complaint on the ground that it showed plaintiff’s intestate to have been an employee engaged at the time of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Jeffrey Manufacturing Co. v. BlaggSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Matter of Jensen v. . Southern Pacific Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Reed v. BrunsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Fireman's Fund Am. Ins. Co. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Gentry v. Swann Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  4. Grantham v. DenkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  5. Huffman v. Southern UnderwritersTexas Supreme Court · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API