Yeiser v. Dysart
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
Upon a report of the respondents, a committee of members of the bar, the plaintiff in error was ordered to be suspended. from the right .to practise, as attorney unless "he should refund to a client a fee. received by him of $620 and interest within a time fixed.' The ground of the order was that by § 3031, Comp. St. 1922, only such sum could be demanded for services in bringing a suit under the workmen’s compensation act of the State as the Court should allow, and that a contract for other and further pay was void. The Supreme Court of the State, while crediting the plaintiff in error with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
3Cited by58 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States Department of Labor v. TriplettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Kay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.