Legal Opinion

Yeiser v. Dysart

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 13, 1925No. 130PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

Upon a report of the respondents, a committee of members of the bar, the plaintiff in error was ordered to be suspended. from the right .to practise, as attorney unless "he should refund to a client a fee. received by him of $620 and interest within a time fixed.' The ground of the order was that by § 3031, Comp. St. 1922, only such sum could be demanded for services in bringing a suit under the workmen’s compensation act of the State as the Court should allow, and that a contract for other and further pay was void. The Supreme Court of the State, while crediting the plaintiff in error with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Children's Hospital of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial RelationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Calhoun v. MassieSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. United States Department of Labor v. TriplettSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Kay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API