Smith v. Hollander
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
Appellant, Hattie Hollander, appeals from a judgment awarding damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in being struck by said appellant’s automobile. Her co-defendant, Arthur Hollander, was granted a nonsuit.
The proof offered by the plaintiff was as follows: While walking westerly on the south sidewalk of Post Street, plaintiff was struck and injured by appellant’s automobile; which ran on to the sidewalk unawares from behind him. He did not see it approach nor hear any horn or warning signal. The only eye-witness 'for the plaintiff testified:
“I saw (the) automobile coming down…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Connor v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Storrs v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Union Constr. Co. v. Western Union Tel. Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Cody v. Market St. Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Harke v. HaaseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.