d'Artenay v. Hansen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment entered after the sustaining of an amended demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint without leave to amend. The demurrer was both general and special. Among various grounds it plead the bar of the cause of action by the provisions of subdivision 1, section 339 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
An examination of the complaint discloses the following allegations: That the plaintiffs and the defendants were husbands and wives; that on or about September 1, 1922, a written contract was entered into whereby the defendants agreed to sell land in Kings County, together with…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Shively v. Semi-Tropic Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- San Diego Construction Co. v. MannixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wyatt v. Cadillac Motor Car DivisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Brown Et Ux. v. Cleverly Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
- Hansen v. D'ArtenayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936