Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. Cadillac Motor Car Division

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 25, 1956No. Civ. 21645PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

The demurrer of defendant General Motors Corporation to plaintiffs’ fourth amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of dismissal.

Plaintiffs purchased a Cadillac from defendant on December 7, 1951, for $4,850.52. This action grows out of its unsatisfactory performance, which developed immediately following delivery.

Plaintiffs’ first cause of action is on the theory of negligence. They allege that in the manufacture and assembly of the automobile defendant’s employees, through mistake and negligence, caused a piece of brown industrial wrapping…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Thomas v. Pacific Beach Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Tremeroli v. Austin Trailer Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. L. B. Laboratories, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Firth v. RichterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  4. Sabella v. WislerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Ford Motor Company v. J. W. McDavidCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API