Legal Opinion
Hansen v. D'Artenay
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1936No. Civ. 1388PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal by J. A. d’Artenay and his wife Octavia from an order of the Superior Court of Kings County denying their motion for restitution of the property involved in this action. Various phases of the controversy have been before this court before. (Hansen v. d’Artenay, 121 Cal. App. 746 [9 Pac. (2d) 889] ; d’Artenay v. Hansen, 138 Cal. App. 39 [31 Pac. (2d) 460].)
Plaintiffs were the owners of eight hundred acres of land in the Tulare Lake Bottoms, and three hundred twenty shares of stock in the Gates-Jones Ditch. Under date of September 1, 1922, they entered into an executory…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Robinson v. ThorntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Yndart v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hardy v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Schubert v. BatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Crenshaw v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hansen v. G & G TRUCKING CO.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. McLaughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Wilkinson v. WilkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.