State v. . Wall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stacy, O. J.
The announcement of the solicitor, made before entering upon the trial, that the State would not ask for a verdict of more than murder in the second degree, was tantamount to taking a nolle prosequi on the capital charge. S. v. Gregory, 203 N. C., 528, 166 S. E., 387; S. v. Brigman, 201 N. C., 793, 161 S. E., 727; S. v. Spain, ibid., 571, 160 S. E., 825; S. v. Hunt, 128 N. C., 584, 38 S. E., 473.
In this state of the record, the testimony of the witness, Shackie Belton, even if regarded as indefinite or too remote in point of time, could not be held for reversible error, though…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. . GregorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- S. v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- State v. . SpainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . HuntSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. HickeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. SpellerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.