Legal Opinion

State v. Cutshall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1971No. 38PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

Defendant contends that he has been placed in double jeopardy by being twice tried for the same capital offense of murder. In this connection he contends that Judge McLean erred in entering an order declaring a mistrial without defendant’s consent at the 25 May 1970 Session of Madison Superior Court, and that he erred in altering the order of mistrial of 1 June 1970 and in signing the same on 28 January 1971.

The burden is upon defendant to sustain his plea of double jeopardy. He failed to plead double jeopardy and to offer supporting evidence thereon, and he is therefore…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. State v. VestalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. NovakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. State v. FoustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. ReeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  4. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. JamesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API