Legal Opinion

Figard v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 22, 1949No. Appeal, 70PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Horace Stern,

In the late hours of a June afternoon a two-year-old child sitting on the outer end of a tie on a railroad track was struck and injured by a slowly moving freight train. In a suit brought against the railroad company by the parents in their own right and by the father as guardian of the minor child verdicts were rendered in favor of the plaintiffs. The defendant now appeals from the refusal of the court below to grant either its motion for a new trial or its motion for judgment n. o. v.

The issues in controversy were purely factual. Plaintiffs asserted that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Peden v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Conn v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Francis v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Piepke v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Echon v. Pennsylyania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Pro v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Gaul v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. HAMLEY v. PITTSBURGH RWYS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API