Legal Opinion

SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 28, 1986No. 01053 and 01054PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This case involves consolidated appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, sitting en banc, denying the post-trial motions of appellant, City of Philadelphia (hereinafter “City”), and appellants, Andrew L. Lewis and Joseph L. Castle, trustees for the Reading Company (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Reading”).

Appellees, Edward Scarborough and his mother, Patricia Scarborough, instituted this action in 1976 against Reading *61to recover for personal injuries sustained by Edward in a railroad train accident which occurred in 1974.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Tagnani v. LewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Robertson v. Atlantic Richfield Petroleum Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. McKinney v. Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Berman v. Radnor Rolls, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. DiSalle v. P.G. Publishing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. SCARBOROUGH BY SCARBOROUGH v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API