Legal Opinion

Gaul v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1989No. 2250PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CIRILLO, President Judge:

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County denying the removal of a compulsory nonsuit and entering judgment in favor of the appellee Consolidated Rail Corporation [Conrail]. We affirm.

This case arises out of the death of plaintiffs/appellants John and Evelyn Gaul’s son, Richard Gaul, on the evening of November 26, 1980. Richard was run over and killed by a train travelling westward from Philadelphia to Reading on Conrail’s Norristown line. From testimony adduced at trial, it appears that at the time of the accident, Richard…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Evans v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Mary Marshall, Individually and as Personal Representative v. Burlington Northern, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Geelen v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Frederick v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Echon v. Pennsylyania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. General Equipment Manufacturers v. Westfield InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Estate of Zimmerman v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transp. AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Vicky M. v. Northeastern Educational Intermediate Unit 19District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API