Legal Opinion
Meder v. City of Oklahoma City
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1960No. 38923Published
1Opinion of the Court
350 P.2d 916 (1960)
Leonard L. MEDER, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, a municipal corporation, Sheldon L. Stirling and Philip J. Rhoads, Trustees of the Oklahoma City Development Trust, the Oklahoma City Development Trust, a trust, and the First National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, Defendants.
James R. Huggins, Intervenor.
No. 38923.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
March 23, 1960.
Dissenting Opinion March 28, 1960.
Supplemental Opinion and Rehearing Denied April 5, 1960.
Withington, Shirk, Nichols & Work, by George H. Shirk, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff.
Edward H. Moler, Municipal Counselor…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re BlissSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Ex Parte HoustonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
- INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST NO. 1, McINTOSH CO. v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Morris v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- City Nat. Bank of Fort Smith v. Incorporated Town of KiowaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.