E & S Express Inc. v. United States

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge:

In this action, Plaintiffs E & S Express Inc. and Simon Ying (“E & S Express”) challenge the decision of the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection denying E & S Express’s protest contesting the assessment of supplemental antidumping duties, with interest, on certain entries of wooden bedroom furniture from the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”). Com plaint ¶¶ 2, 4, 31-32, 34. 1 E & S Express contends that the supplemental antidumping duties were erroneously assessed and that no additional duties are owed, and, through this action, seeks various assorted forms of…