Juarez v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Amended Opinion and Order
Newman, Senior Judge:
This action raises the issue of the proper tariff classification and rate of duty under the Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the United States for plaintiffs’ importations of avocado pulp entered at Laredo, Texas on various dates in 1990. In conformance with 19 U.S.C. *626§ 1514(a), plaintiffs filed administrative protests against the liquidations of the entries, and pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1515 such protests were denied by the District Director by notices of July 30,1991 and September 11,1991. Following 28 U.S.C. §§ 2631 and 2632(b) plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Air-Sea Brokers, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- United States v. Federal Insurance Company and Cometals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Penrod Drilling Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
- Penrod Drilling Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Novelty Imports, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- E & S Express Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
- Second Nature Designs Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Atteberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003