Legal Opinion

Dynasty Footwear v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided November 9, 1982No. Court 81-3-00272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RE, Chief Judge.

In this action contesting the appraised value of shoes imported from Taiwan, defendant moves for an order to sever and dismiss that portion of the action which relates to entry # 233148, protest # 2704-9-001540. Defendant alleges that duties on entry # 233148 were not paid as of March 11, 1981 when this action was commenced. Consequently, defendant argues that the court lacks jurisdiction over entry # 233148. See 28 U.S.C. § 2637(a).

Since monies sufficient to pay the duties owing on entry # 233148 were in the possession of the defendant on or before March 11, 1981, defendant’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eddietron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1980
  2. The Montana Power Company, a Montana Corporation v. The Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. State ex rel. Lane v. ChambersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nature's Farm Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
  2. Glamorise Foundations Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987
  3. Apex Oil Co. v. United States Customs Service (In Re Apex Oil Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Missouri · 1990
  4. Juarez v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
  5. Atteberry v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API