State ex rel. Barrett v. District Court
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Alternative writ of mandamus issued from the supreme court, upon relation of John D. Barrett and another, directed to the district court for Pine county, the judges and clerk thereof, requiring them to transmit to Ramsey county the files and records in the action of A. B. Deahl against relators, or to show cause to the contrary.
1Opinion of the CourtJaggard, J.
In this case, plaintiff commenced an action in the district court of Pine county against the relators, as defendants, to cancel, on the ground of fraudulent misrepresentations, a contract for the purchase of land in Pine county, and to recover the purchase money paid by plaintiff to defendants before the discovery of the fraud. The complaint contains no allegation that the vendors had any title to the land. Demand for change of venue from Pine county to Ramsey county, together with affidavit of residence of the relators at the time of commencement of the action in the latter, was duly served.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Hayes v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Watts v. Waddle Ex Rel. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Hawkins v. IrelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Miller & Lux v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Thompson v. NesheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Nyquist v. District Court of Swift CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Mattix v. SwepstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Calder v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- MacOmber v. WaxbomOregon Supreme Court · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.