Kalia v. St. Cloud State University
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1DissentShort, Judge
While I agree that vicarious official immunity does not bar respondent’s discrimination claims, I respectfully dissent on the non-immunity issues because those issues are not properly before us.
Federal case law on the appealability of orders involving immunity claims may serve as a guide to our interpretation of the right to appeal under our rules of appellate procedure. Cf. Anderson v. City of Hopkins, 393 N.W.2d 363, 364 (Minn.1986) (holding that federal case law “ought to be followed” in interpreting appealability of rulings on immunity of state officials for violations of federal law).…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Swint v. Chambers County CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Anderson v. City of HopkinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- McKenzie v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.