Tessa M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
A mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rights. She argues that the trial court's findings that (1) she had failed to remedy her conduct, and (2) terminating her parental rights was in the child's best interests, are clearly erroneous and therefore the court had no legal basis to terminate her parental rights. The trial court's findings are supported by the evidence presented at trial, and we affirm the termination of parental rights.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
Tammy is the daughter of Tessa and Tom. 1 Tammy was almost three years old when…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- A.A. v. State, Department of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Brynna B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
- Martin N. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
- E.J.S. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Barbara P. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Pravat P. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Hannah B. v. State, Department of Health & Social ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re the Adoption of S.K.L.H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Jude M. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.