Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving Mann

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1993No. S. 4671PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1116 OPINION

MOORE, Chief Justice.

Paul Mann, II, the respondent in this proceeding, and the Alaska Bar Association’s Discipline Counsel entered into a stipulation for discipline by consent. The Bar’s Disciplinary Board accepted the stipulation and recommended that we adopt it. Were we to do so, Mann would have been suspended from the practice of law for three years from August 15, 1991 nunc pro tunc. Instead, we believe Mann should be suspended from the practice of law for three years commencing January 15,1993, the date of our order rejecting the Bar’s stipulation and remanding the case for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving SchulerAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving WestAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. In Re BeckmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  5. Burrell v. Disciplinary Board of the Alaska Bar Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grievance Administrator v. LopatinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In the Disciplinary Matter of FriedmanAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving TriemAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving HanlonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API