Plymouth Rubber Co. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFREY, District Judge.
This is an action brought under 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2201, 2202, in which Plymouth Rubber Company, Inc. seeks declaratory relief against Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Plaintiff seeks a determination that Minnesota’s Oace Reissue Patent, No. 23,843, is not infringed by “Slipknot,” plastic electrical insulating tape manufactured and sold by Plymouth, and, also, requests an injunction against Minnesota’s bringing or threatening to bring any additional suits against Plymouth or any of its customers based on the manufacture, use, or sale of Slipknot tape by Plymouth…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Superior Insulating Tape Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc. Gillette Safety Razor Co. v. Sales Affiliates, IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Nevada & New York v. StacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Codex Corporation v. Milgo Electronic Corporation, Codex Corporation v. Milgo Electronic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
- Shatterproof Glass Corp. v. Guardian Glass CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970
- Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
- Gemveto Jewelry Co., Inc. v. Jeff Cooper Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- General Instrument Corporation v. Hughes Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.