Legal Opinion

Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 9, 1996No. 9211-07901; CA A83575PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant Senco Products, Inc., appeals from a judgment awarding plaintiffs John and Ann Marie Lakin compensatory and punitive damages, following a jury trial on product liability and loss of consortium claims. Those claims arose from an incident in which John Lakin was severely injured while using a nail gun that defendant manufactured and sold. Defendant raises 17 assignments of error pertaining, inter alia, to the trial court’s denial of a directed verdict on liability, the sufficiency of plaintiffs’ proof of entitlement to punitive damages, and the alleged excessiveness of the punitive…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Honda Motor Co. v. ObergSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State Ex Rel. Western Seed Production Corp. v. CampbellOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Greist v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1995

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Sharp Ex Rel. Gordon v. Case Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Purcell v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. Jimenez Ex Rel. Estate of Jimenez v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API