Legal Opinion

Hager v. Tire Recyclers, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1995No. 9211-08008; CA A82492PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendants in this case involving claims of intentional trespass and negligence. We reverse and remand.

The facts relevant to the appeal are not disputed. Plaintiffs own a 19.5-acre parcel of property through which two unnamed tributaries of the Sandy River run. During the wet season, the streams run at approximately 150 gallons per minute. During the dry season, the streams run at “a trickle.” Plaintiffs have built and maintained a series of ponds on their land and have stocked at least one of them with rainbow trout.

Directly upstream from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Gordon Creek Tree Farms, Inc. v. LayneOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Shockey v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Hay v. Oregon Department of TransportationOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ortega v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Marlow v. City of SistersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Main Street Development, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  4. Colmus v. SergeevaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Hager v. Tire Recyclers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API