Legal Opinion
Deovletian v. Whitney
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 4, 1921No. Civ. No. 3903PublishedCited by 3 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. H. Z. Austin, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendants from a judgment for two thousand dollars against them, in an action to recover commissions upon the sale of real estate. Defendants were in the real estate business and plaintiffs were working for them under a contract which, in so far as it is relevant here, reads as follows:
“Pursuant to our conversation of even date, beg to advise that during the period that you continue to carry on the general real estate business in the connection with us, as our representative, we will pay the following commission : (1) On property listed through this office and sold…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Gunn v. Bank of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ayres v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Naylor v. AshtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Wright & Kimbrough v. DeweesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ramsdell v. KrehmkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Nelson v. MayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Strout v. Wayne Tank & Pump Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929