Legal Opinion

Grupe Development Co. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1993No. S020909PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We granted review to determine whether a local “special tax” imposed by a school district on residential property developers to fund new school construction was preempted by a comprehensive statewide legislative reform of school construction financing. As will appear, we conclude that the “special tax” in this case was thus preempted, and hence affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

In 1978 the electorate adopted, as part of Proposition 13, new article XIII A, section 4, of the Constitution, declaring that “Cities, Counties and special districts, by a two-thirds vote of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Myers v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kuhn v. Department of General ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Quintano v. Mercury Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1995

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API