Legal Opinion
California Building Industry Ass'n v. San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 2009No. F055448PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LEVY, J.
Appellants, California Building Industry Association, Coalition for Urban Renewal Excellence, Valley Taxpayers Coalition, and Modesto Chamber of Commerce, challenge the validity of two mies adopted by respondent, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (District). These rales, commonly referred to as indirect source review (ISR), are intended to encourage developers to reduce indirect pollution, i.e., mobile source emissions, caused by new development projects. Under ISR, the developer can reduce emissions by incorporating pollution-reducing features in the project,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ramirez v. Yosemite Water CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Fullerton Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- California Hotel & Motel Ass'n v. Industrial Welfare CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- California Chamber of Commerce v. State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Coalition for Clean Air v. City of VisaliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- National Ass'n of Home Builders v. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Friends of Oceano Dunes, Inc. v. San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Abatti v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.