Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Southern Minnesota MacHinery Sales, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 4, 1990No. C0-90-906, C6-90-392PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
After a jury verdict for James Johnson on his product liability claims, Houdaille Industries, the manufacturer of the product, moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and in the alternative, a new trial. The trial court granted JNOV, but did not rule on the alternative new trial motion. On appeal in Johnson v. Southern Minnesota Machinery Sales, et al, 442 N.W.2d 843 (Minn.App.1989), pet. for rev. denied (Minn. Sept. 21, 1989), pet. for reh’g denied (Minn. Oct. 19, 1989) (Johnson I) we reversed the JNOV. Houdaille unsuccessfully renewed its new trial motion in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Hodder v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- John S. Mays v. Pioneer Lumber Corporation, a West Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Connolly v. Nicollet HotelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gopher Oil Co., Inc. v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Quade & Sons Refrigeration, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Westling Manufacturing Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- Peters v. Independent School District Number 657Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Quade & Sons Refrigeration, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994