Legal Opinion

Berry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1996No. Docket 184236PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, appeals as of right an order, following a bench trial, providing that the claim of plaintiff, Telia Katherine Berry, for uninsured motorist benefits under a no-fault policy of insurance issued to her by defendant be arbitrated in accordance with the terms and conditions of the policy. We affirm.

The insurance policy provides in relevant part as follows:

We will pay damages for bodily injury an insured is legally entitled to collect from the owner or driver of an uninsured motor vehicle. The bodily injury must be caused by accident…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rohlman v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Triple E Produce Corp. v. Mastronardi Produce, Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Adams v. ZajacMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Kersten v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. BuckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Theis v. Midwest Security InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Schellenberg v. Rochester, Michigan, Lodge No 2225 of the Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the United States of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Dancey v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Davidson v. BugbeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Cruz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API