SECRETARY OF INT., US DEPT. OF INTERIOR v. Shingara
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MUIR, District Judge.
The above matter is before the Court on a case stated. Both parties agree that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that a decision on a motion for summary judgment under F.R.Civ.P. 56 is appropriate. Both parties have filed such motions.
Edward and Frederick Shingara, the Defendants, operate an underground coal mine located near Treverton, Northumberland County, Pennsylvania. They are, at this time, the only individuals who work the mine. Edward goes underground, while Frederick does the hoisting.
On September 17, 1975, in an attempted exercise of his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Dye Construction Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- The Von Solbrig Hospital, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marshall v. DonofrioDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Marshall v. KraynakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Andrus v. P-Burg Coal Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1980
- Marshall v. KraynakDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Marshall v. BosackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.