Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Kraynak
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 22, 1979No. 78-2576PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This appeal from summary judgment in favor of the Secretary of Labor, brought by the owners of a small coal mine, requires us to decide whether the provisions of the Federal Coal Mine Act apply to circumstances in which the only miners working a mine are the four brothers who own and operate it. The district court determined that the miner-operators came within the provisions of the Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 30 U.S.C. §§ 801-960 (1976). We affirm for the reasons stated by the Honorable Louis Rosenberg, 457 F. Supp. 907 (W.D.Pa.1978), and by Judge Muir in his…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Stoudt's Ferry Preparation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- SECRETARY OF INT., US DEPT. OF INTERIOR v. ShingaraDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
- Marshall v. KraynakDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
4Cited by6 opinions
- Marshall v. KraynakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- D.A.S. Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. ChaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Marshall v. ConwayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Brock ex rel. Williams v. Peabody Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Marshall v. Kniseley Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.