Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Kraynak
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 23, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-962PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
The matter now before me is on a motion for summary judgment filed by the plaintiff, Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor, under the Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act of 1969, 30 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (hereinafter called the “Act”). The plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants, William R. Kraynak, Thomas Kraynak, George Robert Kraynak, and Richard Kraynak, a partnership, trading and doing business as Kraynak Coal Company, No. 3 Mine, from allowing Federal Inspectors, agents of the plaintiff, to inspect the Kraynak coal mine.
The defendants resist the action of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mandeville Island Farms, Inc. v. American Crystal Sugar Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Bituminous Coal Operators' Ass'n v. Secretary of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Costanzo Coal Min. Co. v. Weirton Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- Morton v. BloomDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- SECRETARY OF INT., US DEPT. OF INTERIOR v. ShingaraDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Usery v. LacyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Marshall v. KraynakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- Marshall v. KraynakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- 8 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 2060, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,833 W. J. Usery, Jr., Secretary of Labor v. Franklin R. Lacy (Aqua View Apartments), and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Marshall v. Kniseley Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980