Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Bosack

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 22, 1978No. Civ. A. 77-3223PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM TO SUPPLEMENT BENCH OPINION

HUYETT, District Judge.

On April 21, 1978, I held oral argument on the parties’ motions for summary judgment. After argument, I orally rendered an opinion from the bench, granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiff Secretary of Labor and stating the reasons for my conclusions. The purpose of this memorandum is to clarify and amplify those reasons stated in open court.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendants Frank Bosack and Edward Hoke own and operate as a partnership a coal preparation plant, the Glen Worth Coal Company (Glen Worth), located near…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Katzenbach v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Morton v. BloomDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. SECRETARY OF INT., US DEPT. OF INTERIOR v. ShingaraDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Andrus v. P-Burg Coal Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1980
  2. Marshall v. KilgoreDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1979
  3. Marshall v. Kniseley Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Marshall v. Meredith Mining Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API