Legal Opinion

Shelton v. Boydstun Beach Ass'n

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1982No. 13866PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

Gladys Shelton brought a quiet title action against the Boydstun Beach Association, its officers, and other parties. She claimed that by adverse possession she had terminated the Association’s easement across her land. The trial court entered judgment extinguishing a portion of the easement. We affirm.

All defendants in this case have been designated as appellants, but the appeal actually appears to be that of the Association. The Association has asked us to examine the tests for extinguishing an easement by adverse possession, and to determine whether the tests were met.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Glatts v. HensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Swanson v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Desotell v. SzczygielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  5. Pleasants v. HenryIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kolouch v. KramerIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bonanza Motors, Inc. v. WebbIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Boydstun Beach Ass'n v. AllenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Middlekauff v. Lake Cascade, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. East Lizard Butte Water Corp. v. HowellIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API