Legal Opinion

Middlekauff v. Lake Cascade, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1986No. 15941, 16002PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISTLINE, Justice.

Plaintiffs — owners of property located in the Lake Cascade subdivision which they purchased from Lake Cascade, Inc. (Lake Cascade) — alleged an interest in an undeveloped area, which interest was based on Lake Cascade’s representations that the area would be maintained as a common recreational area. Initially, the district court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, but this Court reversed and remanded for trial. Middlekauff v. Lake Cascade, Inc., 103 Idaho 832, 654 P.2d 1385 (1982) (Middlekauff I). Trial resulted in judgment for the plaintiffs. Defendants…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rueth v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ute Park Summer Homes Ass'n v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Bailey v. NessIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Loomis v. ChurchIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Clark v. GneitingIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. McKay v. OwensIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  2. East Lizard Butte Water Corp. v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bettwieser v. New York Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  4. West Wood Investments, Inc. v. AcordIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Vennerberg Farms, Inc. v. IGF Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API