Brush v. Kurstin
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by:
A. Defendant Morris A. Kurstin from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for damages in the sum of $4,697.50 after a trial before a jury;
B. Defendant Bernice Kurstin from an order granting plaintiff a new trial on the issue of damages solely.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to plaintiff (Ah Gett v. Carr, 3 Cal. App. 47, 48 [84 Pac. 458]), the facts in the instant case are:
Plaintiff at approximately 10:15 P. M., December 17, 1934, approached the southwest corner of Wilshire and Rampart Boulevards in the city of Los Angeles. Looking west on Wilshire…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Meyers v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phipps v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Garcia v. San Gabriel Ready MixtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Holland v. KodimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Welch v. SinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Hamasaki v. FlothoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.