Legal Opinion
In Re Vizzard
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 31, 1967No. Crim. No 4574PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT
On May 10, 1966, this court filed its decision denying petitions for habeas corpus sought by Kenneth Van Brunt and Hugh Vizzard (Crim. Nos. 3996 and 4003; reported as In re Van Brunt, 242 Cal.App.2d 96 [51 Cal.Rptr. 136]). A year later, on May 5, 1967, the Supreme Court filed its decision in In re Smiley, 66 Cal.2d 606 [58 Cal.Rptr. 579, 427 P.2d 179]. In the course of the Smiley opinion the court stated (66 Cal.2d at pp. 626-627) : “We conclude that the denial of petitioner’s right to counsel requires his judgment of conviction to be set aside without inquiry into the matter of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- White v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. NicolausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Curry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Hugh Vizzard, and v. Raymond K. Procunier, AndCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971