Legal Opinion
United States v. National Steel Corp.
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided December 16, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 13032PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INGRAHAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, United States of America, brings an action under 15 U.S.C.A. § 18 (Section 7, Clayton Act), against National Steel Corporation (“National”), Stran-Steel Corporation (“Stran-Steel”), Metallic Building Company (“Metallic”), and three individuals. The alleged violation grew out of the purchase of control of Metallic by Stran-Steel. Plaintiff, pursuant to Fed.Rule Civ.Proc. 34, 28 U.S.C.A., moves the court for an order requiring corporate defendants to produce and to permit plaintiff to inspect and copy certain documents in defendants’ possession. The relevant…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thomas French & Sons, Ltd. v. Carleton Venetian Blind Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1939
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. ShieldsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
- United States v. United States Alkali Export Ass'n, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- United States v. National Steel Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Greenberg's Express, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
- Guilford National Bank v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
- The Guilford National Bank of Greensboro, Administrator C.T.A., D.B.N., of the Estate of Joseph M. Coble, Deceased v. Southern Railway Company, and Third-Party v. Garland Batchelor, of the Estate of Annie J. Coble, Deceased, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
- Crist v. GoodyColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Hager v. GrahamDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.