Legal Opinion
Rickert v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided April 12, 1996No. 2:95-cr-00072PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BRIMMER, District Judge.
Mitsubishi has filed a motion for summary judgment based on its argument that the General Aviation Revitalization Act’s statute of limitations bars Rickert’s claims. Riekert opposes Mitsubishi’s motion on the ground that her claims fit within the misrepresentation exception to GARA’s statute of limitations.
Background
In the pre-dawn hours of April 6, 1993, Casper Air Service pilot Thomas Riekert began his approach to the Casper Airport. Enveloped by darkness and snow, with the low-slung clouds breaking a mere 400 feet above the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Altseimer v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 1996
- Sapp v. CunninghamDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robinson v. Hartzell Propeller Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Tillman v. Raytheon Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Burton v. Twin Commander Aircraft LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- South Side Trust & Savings Bank v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Burton v. Twin Commander Aircraft, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.