Legal Opinion

Altseimer v. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 20, 1996No. Civ. S-95-1600 WBS/GGHPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHUBB, District Judge.

Before the court is defendant Bell Helicopter Textron’s motion for summary judgment on all the claims in plaintiffs’ complaint.

BACKGROUND

On May 23,1995, plaintiffs John Altseimer, Horizon Helicopters, Dennis Westerberg, and Sloane Westerberg filed this action for personal injuries, property damage, and economic losses allegedly arising out of a helicopter accident. Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. (“Bell”) is the only named defendant. The complaint alleges that Bell designed, manufactured, assembled, tested, fabricated, produced, sold, or otherwise placed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lyon v. Agusta, S.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Burroughs v. Precision Airmotive Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Rickert v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1996
  4. South Side Trust & Savings Bank v. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. Bain Ex Rel. Bain v. Honeywell Intern., Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API