Legal Opinion
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Konover
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 20, 2009No. 3:05cv01924(CFD)(WIG)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON NON-PARTY KONOVER FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP’S MOTION FOR RECOVERY OF COSTS AND ATTORNEY’S FEES [DOC. #586]
WILLIAM I. GARFINKEL, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 45, Fed.R.Civ.P., non-party Konover Family Limited Partnership (“KFLP”) has moved for a recovery of the costs and fees it incurred in objecting and responding to discovery requests from Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Trustee, in the amount of $229,763.43. KFLP claims that an award is mandatory under Rule 45 because it was neither a party to the underlying Maryland litigation nor is it a party to this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Standard Chlorine of Delaware, Inc. v. SinibaldiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
- In re the Exxon ValdezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- In re Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Linder v. Calero-PortocarreroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Tutor-Saliba Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cdw Government, Inc v. McKnight & Kennedy, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- De Lage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. Spinal Technologies, LLCSuperior Court of Delaware · 2021
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- In re Andrey Grigoryevich GurievDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2025
- In re Novartis and Par Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.