Legal Opinion

Cdw Government, Inc v. McKnight & Kennedy, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 16, 2012No. Misc. No. 2010-0789Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE SUBPOENAS TO BRADY FOLLIARD AND MCKNIGHT & KENNEDY, LLC. MCKNIGHT & KENNEDY, LLC, No 10-mc-789 (ESH) (AK) Respondant, v. CDW GOVERNMENT, INC., Movant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case is referred to the undersigned for determination of McKnight and Kennedy, LLC’s (“McKnight”) Motion for Attorney Fees and Costs [14]. CDW Government, Inc. (“CDW”) filed an Opposition [15] and the undersigned held a hearing on January 31, 2012. Plaintiff’s Motion will be denied, because Plaintiff has a strong interest in the underlying lawsuit. I.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. United States v. Melvin D. Wallace and Arthur M. LevinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. In re the Exxon ValdezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
  5. In re Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API