Legal Opinion

In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 18, 2020No. 1:18-cv-04361Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------- X : : : ORDER GRANTING MOTION : TO COMPEL DISCOVERY In Re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation : : 18 Civ. 4361 (AKH) : : : -------------------------------------------------------------- X ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: Plaintiffs move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 for an order compelling nonparties Lupin Limited and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively, “Lupin”) to produce various materials responsive to a subpoena. See Motion to Compel, ECF No.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rowe v. Brooklyn Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. KonoverDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API