Legal Opinion

Smith v. Board of Apportionment

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 3, 1951No. 4-9607PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin Smith, Chief Justice.

This is an original proceeding under Amendment No. 23 to the Constitution. See Bailey, Lieutenant Governor, v. Abington, 201 Ark. 1072,148 S. W. 2d 176,149 S. W. 2d 573; Shaw, Autry and Shofner v. Adkins, Governor, 202 Ark. 856, 153 S. W. 2d 415; Butler v. Democratic State Committee, 204 Ark. 14, 160 S. W. 2d 494. Only the House of Representatives was involved in the Shaw case.

Clyde E. Smith and Floyd H. Fulkerson, Jr., are citizens and taxpayers of Pulaski county. Their contention is that the Thirteenth senatorial district, composed of Pulaski county alone, is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey, Lieutenant-Governor v. AbingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  2. Shaw, Autry and Shofner v. Adkins, Gov.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. Butler v. Democratic State CommitteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942
  4. Carpenter v. Board of ApportionmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Block v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  2. Yancey v. FaubusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965
  3. Pickens v. Board of ApportionmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  4. Bizzell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  5. Bizzell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API