Legal Opinion

Yancey v. Faubus

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided January 28, 1965No. LR-64-C-96PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENLEY, Chief District Judge.

On June 15, 1964, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down a series of decisions, hereinafter referred to as the Keapportionment Cases, holding in substance that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States requires that the membership of each house of a bicameral State legislature be apportioned so that, as nearly as practicable, each member of the respective houses represents the same number of people. Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 12 L.Ed.2d 506; W.M.C.A., Inc. v. Lonenzo, 377 U.S. 633, 84…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Lucas v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Roman v. SincockSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. TawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Faubus v. KinneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Baker v. CarrDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1965
  3. Block v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  4. Yancey v. FaubusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965
  5. Taylor v. ClintonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API