Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Board of Apportionment

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 19, 1951No. 4-9505PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents are the Board of Apportionment created by Amendment No. 23 to the Constitution, Sec. 1. The question is whether, under Sec. 4 of the Amendment, a reapportionment should have been made on or before February 1. Section 5 authorizes mandamus where the Board has failed to perform its duties. The response was to a petition by Carpenter in which it was alleged that the Federal census had been completed and that the Board had failed to act.

In extenuation the Board says that when it met January 26th, 1951, official census figures by counties were not available. Attached to the response is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Childers v. DuvallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Board of ApportionmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  2. City of Rochester v. County of MonroeNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
  4. Smith v. Board of ApportionmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API