Pickens v. Board of Apportionment
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Grieein Smith, Obief Justice.
In a cause styled Smith v. The Board of Apportionment, 219 Ark. 611, 243 S. W. 2d 755, the directive was that Pulaski county, or the senatorial district of which it became a part, be given at least three senators. This was thought necessary, as the opinion reflects, because the 1950 census disclosed a county population of 196,685, the population of the state was 1,909,511, and the Thirteenth district embracing Pulaski county alone was under-represented from a numerical standpoint by a percentage equation of 80.26.
Amendment No. 23 to the Constitution requires the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Smith v. Board of ApportionmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Faubus v. KinneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Block v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Yancey v. FaubusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965
- Wells v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Bizzell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.