Legal Opinion

Pickens v. Board of Apportionment

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1952No. 4-9781PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grieein Smith, Obief Justice.

In a cause styled Smith v. The Board of Apportionment, 219 Ark. 611, 243 S. W. 2d 755, the directive was that Pulaski county, or the senatorial district of which it became a part, be given at least three senators. This was thought necessary, as the opinion reflects, because the 1950 census disclosed a county population of 196,685, the population of the state was 1,909,511, and the Thirteenth district embracing Pulaski county alone was under-represented from a numerical standpoint by a percentage equation of 80.26.

Amendment No. 23 to the Constitution requires the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Board of ApportionmentSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faubus v. KinneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  2. Block v. AllenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  3. Yancey v. FaubusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965
  4. Wells v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Bizzell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API