Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. THOMAS

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1957PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKester, J.

This appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of the complaint in an ejectment action. No demurrer was filed, but on trial defendants objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the complaint failed to allege that plaintiff or his predecessors in title had possession within ten years. * The trial court sustained the objection and entered judgment dismissing the complaint, from which plaintiff appeals.

The statutes provide for the content of a complaint in ejectment, † and this complaint followed the statutes.

It alleged:

“I

4 4 The plaintiff now is and at all times…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reeves v. PortaOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Demartini v. HayhurstOregon Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Furrer v. Talent Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  2. DENHAM ET UX v. CuddebackOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Fox v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Simpson v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  5. Brusco v. BruscoOregon Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API