Demartini v. Hayhurst
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.
As will be observed from the preceding statement, this appeal presents no issue of facts. The facts are set forth in the complaint and the answer. All averments of the complaint are admitted by the answer. Plaintiffs filed a demurrer to the latter whieh was overruled, and, the plaintiffs declining to plead further, the decree was entered. We shall now set forth a synopsis of the complaint and follow it with a synopsis of the answer. Omitting mention of facts already indi-, cated in the preceding statement, the complaint alleges that on October 26, 1891, William S. and Caroline A. Ladd owned a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ewertsen v. GerstenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- Menstell v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hewitt v. THOMASOregon Supreme Court · 1957
- Allied Veterans Council v. Klamath CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975