Legal Opinion

DENHAM ET UX v. Cuddeback

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1957PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarner, J.

This is an action in trespass by the plaintiffs-appellants, Bert Denham and wife, against the defendant-respondent, Sol A. Cuddeback, to recover treble damages for cutting and removing timber from land alleged to he owned by plaintiffs. The jury found for defendant and from the judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

The parties are the owners of adjacent tracts of land in Lane County. The defendant is purchasing his parcel under a sales contract from Geneva S. Seavey. Plaintiffs’ west boundary is defendant’s east boundary. The land trespassed upon, according to plaintiffs, and from…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Nelson v. BrodhackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  2. Schafer v. Fraser Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. EvansOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Godvig v. LopezOregon Supreme Court · 1949

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. NicholsOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State ex rel. Department of Transportation v. TolkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Witt v. ReavisOregon Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API