Legal Opinion

Copper Range Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1948No. Docket No. 3, Calendar No. 43,818PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, C. J.

Plaintiff Copper Range Company, a Michigan corporation, is engaged in the mining, milling and smelting of copper. Prior to September 20, 1945, it employed 596 men in its mining operations at Painesdale, Michigan, 67 in its mill at Preda, and 83 in its smelter at Coles Creek. These employees are members of the International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers, C.I.O., United Copper Workers, Local 494. Plaintiff’s relations with its employees are expressed by a written working agreement dated May 10, 1945. Under this agreement, rates of pay are governed by those in effect on September 30,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawrence Baking Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Godsol v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. O'Brian v. Michigan Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Auten v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Palmer v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. ErvesMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Smith v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Thomas v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Allen v. Core Target City Youth ProgramCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Wickey v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API